September 30, 2009.
Archive for September, 2009
Rare Birds of West Texas
Wednesday, September 30th, 2009Responses 2 Crumb & Thoreau & why I do this
Friday, September 25th, 2009Friday, September 25, 2009.
This week, my research and writing class has been responding to a piece by R. Crumb and excerpts from Thoreau’s journals in one of our course texts, American Earth: Environmental Writing Since Thoreau.


I am continually impressed by their imaginative responses that demonstrate their engagement with the reading assignments. See some nice drawings below.
& why I do this
I should probably explain more about how these reading response visuals contribute to my teaching and my students’ learning. College teachers face a common pedagogical issue: “How do we know that students are actually reading and engaging the ideas contained in the assigned homework?” This is a particularly important question if the faculty member wants to talk with students about what they read–that is, actually engage students in thinking about what the author is proposing, about the characters in the narrative, about the imagery in the poem, about the version of history being portrayed.
Some faculty respond to this issue by giving pop quizzes. Some have students lead class discussions on the assigned text. Some have students bring questions about the reading written on index cards and collect them as students enter the class. Others have students write a brief response in a journal or in a more formal typed response. Some have students represent their responses or the argument of the text visually.

In my classes, I have students either write or draw their responses, and I designate which texts I want them to write about and for which texts I want them to create a visual response. In either case, I then ask students to share those responses in groups of 3 or 4.
I then assign these small groups another task, frequently a task that they will share with the entire class, such as “Identify together what you take to be the author’s main claim and a question that you have about that claim. Then select a member of your group to write that question on the board.”
These questions then serve as the roadmap for whole class discussion. During this discussion, I help students learn to interrogate the questions, connect them back to the text, and then prompt them to consider how these and other related questions might serve as effective starting points for their research projects.
This is the basic agenda for every one of my class sessions. They read, they respond, they share their responses in small groups, I assigned a small group task related to the reading and their responses, they share the outcome of the task with the whole class, we discuss those outcomes, and that discussion leads to further research and reading.
And that’s why creating a successful strategy for getting students to read and respond to the daily assigned reading is so important to me. Otherwise, students aren’t actively engaged in what the course has to offer them: continual practice in reading, responding (in text or images or both), sharing, talking, listening, connecting ideas, and developing questions for further reading and writing.
OK, back to the drawings
The piece by Crumb called “A Short History of America” is reproduced in black and white in our text, but here is a color version of original image from R. Crumb’s website.

And here are some sample responses from my class. Some have tried to imagine what the next image in the sequence might be. Some have responded with other kinds of images.

——————————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————————–
——————————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————————–
——————————————————————————————–
The responses to the excerpts from Thoreau’s journals are here:

——————————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————————–

——————————————————————————————–
If you click on any of these last 4 images, you will be internetically transported to my flickr site where you’ll find the text citations that correspond to each.
Chicken and Egg Theory
Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009Drawing Out Research Questions
Monday, September 21st, 2009Monday, September 21, 2009.
I have been sharing over the past month or so how I have incorporated visual thinking into my college writing course here at Angelo State. This is a first-year research and writing class that I’ve organized around the general theme of human relationships with the natural world. The two texts for the course include John T. Gage’s The Shape of Reason: Argumentative Writing in College

and Bill McKibben’s American Earth: Environmental Writing Since Thoreau.

I have asked students to use drawing in three main ways so far.
1. During the first class, I asked them to draw their relationships with the natural world. Here’s a sample:
2. On the second day of class, I asked them to draw a picture of what happens when they read. Here are three samples:

————————————————————————————————-
————————————————————————————————-
————————————————————————————————-
3. For almost every class period thereafter, I have asked them to draw responses to assigned readings following format guidelines I’ve developed from Dan Roam’s The Back of the Napkin. Here’s a sample a response to Buckminster Fuller’s “Spaceship Earth.”
This last week, I added a fourth drawing task. I asked students to use drawing to depict the questions they intended to research in their first writing projects. Then, they brought those drawings to a conference with me so that we might discuss their questions and possible sources for their research. I found these drawings remarkable; they were very useful in helping me understand my students’ interests and in helping us refine together their research questions.
Here are nine of those drawings with the corresponding research questions.

Question at issue: “What are the environmental consequences of the OC Fisher Reservoir Dam?”
Question at issue: “What is being done in San Angelo to promote recycling and what impact is the economy having on those efforts?”
Question at issue: “What policies are in place to certify the safety of the food supply?”
Question at issue: “What are the current UN programs related to population control?”
Question at issue: “What is the status of current knowledge on damage to the ozone?”
Question at issue: “What can individual households do to increase energy efficiencies and reduce energy costs?”
Question at issue: “What is the role of the USDA in certifying the safety of beef?”
Question at issue: “What kinds of recycling programs in San Angelo are under consideration by city government?”
Question at issue: “What sort of pollution controls are instituted at the San Angelo Cattle Yard?”
Visualizing The Population Bomb
Friday, September 18th, 2009Friday, September 18, 2009
Today, I am posting my students’ reading visual responses to an excerpt from Paul Ehrlich’s The Population Bomb written in 1968. This excerpt is included in one of our course texts American Earth: Environmental Writing Since Thoreau edited by Bill McKibben.
Here’s one:
These drawings are responses to assigned readings, and students follow format guidelines I’ve developed from Dan Roam’s The Back of the Napkin. Here are the actual assignment guidelines.
I wanted to share this group of drawings for three reasons.
First, I think they’re pretty amazing drawings, especially for students in a sophomore-level college research and writing class.
Second, I think they nicely demonstrate the variety of visual formats available to illustrate Ehrlich’s argument.
Third, I am noticing that as students are gaining experience in using the basic formats I’ve taught them, they are beginning to combine or integrate formats into a single drawing. For example, several of the drawings in this sample combine pie charts and timelines or maps and timelines. This level of sophistication was unanticipated by me, but it’s clearly representative of their abilities to draw their responses in more complex or advanced ways.
It’s Raining in Texas
Wednesday, September 16th, 2009Mary Karr at Angelo State 2010
Monday, September 14th, 2009Drawings on The End of Nature
Friday, September 11th, 2009Friday, September 11, 2009.
In a previous post, I shared some of the first drawings from my first-year writing classes.
These drawings are responses to assigned readings, and students follow format guidelines I’ve developed from Dan Roam’s The Back of the Napkin. Here are the actual assignment guidelines.
Here below are more student drawings; this time in response to a selection from Bill McKibben’s The End of Nature included in one of our course texts, American Earth, also edited by McKibben.
Drawing 1
Drawing 2
Drawing 3
Drawing 4
Drawing 5
Drawing 6
The Problem with Problems
Wednesday, September 9th, 20091st Reading Visuals from 1st Year Class
Monday, September 7th, 2009Monday, September 7, 2009.
Some time ago, I wrote about providing my writing students with strategies for responding visually to reading assignments.
I have just begun to have my first-year students practice those strategies. Here below are two drawings using the map format. They are both responses to R. Buckminster Fuller’s “Spaceship Earth.”
Fuller Drawing 1
Fuller Drawing 2
The next three drawings respond to the introduction to American Earth, a collection of environmental writing. The introduction is by Bill McKibben. The first uses the timeline format, the second uses the web format, and the third uses the tree format.
McKibben Drawing 1
McKibben Drawing 2
McKibben Drawing 3
The final drawing below responds to a selection on critical reading from our argument text The Shape of Reason by John T. Gage. This drawing uses the web format.
Gage Drawing 1
Here are the guidelines for reading visuals:






























